RAT Summit

Public Forum open to all visitors.
Post Reply
User avatar
Sniper62
Site Admin
Posts: 2657
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2004 4:38 am
Location: Alexandria, VA
Contact:

RAT Summit

Post by Sniper62 »

I went to the RAT Summit down in Dallas and it was a very good and productive event. We discussed current issues, future issues, and the future plans of the game. Lots of things were talked about but one was about, what would it currently take to get old players back into the game?

Whatchyall got?
Sniper62
CO RAF 617 Squadron "The DamBusters"
Image

My Movies: (youtube links, PM me if you are interested in higher res)-BARCAP in Action-Fighter Action-Fighter Action #2-Sniper of 09s-109f1vsSpitV
User avatar
Pegasusbelgar
Posts: 839
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:36 pm

Re: RAT Summit

Post by Pegasusbelgar »

You know my stance, more variety of aircraft, more bombers especially for each country (No new aircraft since 2005 - P38). Clone bombers with custom formations/numbers or ai flying. (something Aces High and Warbirds have had for over 10 years) to make larger formations benefiting both sides.
Pegasus
Member
RAF 617 Squadron, "The Dambusters"
Image
User avatar
Sniper62
Site Admin
Posts: 2657
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2004 4:38 am
Location: Alexandria, VA
Contact:

Re: RAT Summit

Post by Sniper62 »

unfortunately bring in new vehicles is something the team has yet to do...there will be some variants that will be coming in hopefully not too long from now. I think 1.36 will make a big difference on how much RDP/resupply timer bombing will have to do with the game play but we shall see.
Sniper62
CO RAF 617 Squadron "The DamBusters"
Image

My Movies: (youtube links, PM me if you are interested in higher res)-BARCAP in Action-Fighter Action-Fighter Action #2-Sniper of 09s-109f1vsSpitV
User avatar
Pegasusbelgar
Posts: 839
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:36 pm

Re: RAT Summit

Post by Pegasusbelgar »

Larger airfields or extend the tiles to make a longer runway for bombers, given how small the fields are now esepcially for those with trees on the end of the runway (whose the artist that thought that was a good idea), many a times we lifted off in large formations to only have one or two clipping trees meaning we had to circle the field wasting time.

The Airfields and runways in War Thunder are good examples on how it should be done.
Pegasus
Member
RAF 617 Squadron, "The Dambusters"
Image
User avatar
Kizmet
Site Admin
Posts: 2802
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2004 1:17 am
Location: Savannah Georgia

Re: RAT Summit

Post by Kizmet »

B26 was a varient of the A20 I believe. Just watched something about the varient on TV a few days ago.
Kizmet
Executive Officer
RAF 617 Squadron, The DamBusters
AHC COS Retired
AHC CinC Staff, Retired
BEF CinC, Retired
RAF CO, Retired


Image

Apres Moi Le Deluge!
After me, the flood!

Image
"The DamBusters - not just a squad, a game imbalance"
gators1 wrote:I think a battalion of Georgia rednecks can easily take a bunch of Vermont hippies with peace symbols on their uniforms.
User avatar
Cono
Posts: 1031
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2005 12:48 pm

Re: RAT Summit

Post by Cono »

Kizmet wrote:B26 was a varient of the A20 I believe. Just watched something about the varient on TV a few days ago.
A-20 was developed by the Douglas Company.

A-26 was also developed by the Douglas Company but was a different aircraft (probably the same design team though). It was later (after WWII) designated B-26 which caused confusion with the WWII B-26. Was also used in the Korean and Viet Nam war.

B-26 was developed by the Martin Company. I believe it was retired right after WWII which allowed the Douglas A-26 to be redesignated B-26.

All were different aircraft, although similar in appearance and function.

My first boss was a WWII navigator/bombadier on a B-26 in the ETO.
Cono (a.k.a. Conobot)
Specialist in airfield suppression and airfield defence

Image
Post Reply